From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d067a5a7c60c3b40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unchecked_Deallocation vs. delete References: <1178728045.890171.6110@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1hzydt9ej6az6$.12jl0su9budun.dlg@40tude.net> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:10:57 +0200 Message-ID: <1dbqgs2xlq.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4XeTvu3rsscBvvrKF1WrXsXwX7I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.220.144 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1178830946 88.72.220.144 (10 May 2007 23:02:26 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.musoftware.de!morpheus.pingos.org!news.szaf.org!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15768 Date: 2007-05-10T23:10:57+02:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > On 9 May 2007 09:27:25 -0700, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > >> What's the benefit of Unchecked_Deallocation as a generic library >> procedure vs. built-in deallocation operator like delete in C++? > > To make it harder to use. My theory is, they did it on the express purpose to antagonize you. Someone must have had the second sight and foreseen that you don't like generics. Regards -- Markus