From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f309:: with SMTP id p9mr9270525qkg.363.1623513930862;
        Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:75d6:: with SMTP id q205mr12740919ybc.339.1623513930733;
 Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sa2lhe$ig3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.31.98.170; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.31.98.170
References: <c6169572-25bc-4db7-a50d-c6c8575069a4n@googlegroups.com>
 <sa2bpc$it8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <aa8d1e4f-494e-4d8a-8c44-edfdb7f3ec04n@googlegroups.com>
 <sa2lhe$ig3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1d798609-8b73-4bc6-b74f-e435e8af8fedn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: non-preemptive tasking on GNAT 2020 Windows 10 multicore AMD
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 16:05:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62199
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov schrieb am Samstag, 12. Juni 2021 um 17:57:39 UTC+2:
> Because under Windows the default priority is in the time sharing class. 
> As the name suggests such threads are preempted when the their quant 
> expires. AFAIK, even a lower priority thread can preempt a higher 
> priority one if both are time sharing. Time sharing priority only 
> influences the duration of the quant and the chances to gain the processor.

Hm OK. Is this compatible with the Ada RM?