From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,94d84e4971c0caee
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Inheritance with Ada types
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 02:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <1d6a685b-c07d-42fa-b8f4-02c74ac70169@u26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <ad9aca45-33dc-4765-a998-44a6b57dbe50@q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
	<92c90b37-0e9b-49f4-ab37-fbd256ed6f06@k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<ir8rkh.hqm.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.172
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265710776 868 127.0.0.1 (9 Feb 2010 10:19:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.172;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9024
Date: 2010-02-09T02:19:36-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 9 f=E9v, 10:11, Jean-Pierre Rosen <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> > clause... the use clause is particularly evil here.
With package named Parent, containing a type named Parent, having a
use clause on Parent brings into a context where the name Package can
be both resolved as a package or as a type.

The use clause is clearly involved here, as one the way to get ride of
this error is to remove the use clause. The other way being to rename
either the type either the package.

May be I was wrong to say the use clause is particularly evil there :
I should have said =93 the use clause is particularly vicious there
=94 (due to its vicious side effect in such a kind of context).