From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a5f6199c3cc0e8b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.43.117.133 with SMTP id fm5mr12933741icc.7.1320337054420;
        Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p6ni66964pbn.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n38g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: awdorrin <awdorrin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Calling Ada from C (linux/gnat 4.3.2)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <1d620e6c-4b03-40f0-aa8e-486a7a02fb23@n38g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <8ba649f0-7ca1-4f05-a158-74b074e401ee@o19g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>
 <82ehxqmrvx.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.31.106.34
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1320337054 21779 127.0.0.1 (3 Nov 2011 16:17:34
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:17:34 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n38g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.31.106.34;
 posting-account=YkFdLgoAAADpWnfCBA6ZXMWTz2zHNd0j
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESRCNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Xref: news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:14292
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2011-11-03T09:17:34-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thanks for the suggestions

Jeff - yes, I'm calling adainit/final - the Ada code is executing when
I remove the -fstack-check, its just running rampant through memory
and the threads are clobbering each other.

Simon - Thanks, the GNAT.Threads.Register_Thread sounds promising -
I'm wondering if it may be the equivalent of the rts_init_task() call.

Stephen - believe me, I'd rather do that, but I'm limited in my
options for which parts of the program I can modify.

I haven't had a chance to try out Simon's suggestion yet. I had
problem with the Linux server that had me spending all day
reinstalling the OS...

Will follow up once I get things reconfigured.