From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.102.40 with SMTP id fl8mr12643789pab.4.1432933207441;
 Fri, 29 May 2015 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.28.227 with SMTP id e3mr83661obh.33.1432933207371; Fri,
 29 May 2015 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!h15no402950igd.0!news-out.google.com!n7ni47654igk.0!nntp.google.com!h15no402940igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.CYG.2.11.1505290801190.6584@WIL414CHAPIN.vtc.vsc.edu>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.0.105.201;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.0.105.201
References: <mjlale$dpk$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <127b004d-2163-477b-9209-49d30d2da5e1@googlegroups.com>
 <mjn90s$9av$1@dont-email.me>
 <f89a678a-f4a3-4a1c-91d7-d465177bbb1d@googlegroups.com>
 <mjnieh$ejn$1@dont-email.me>
 <ad8483c7-8f3c-4469-9079-a97ca3abaf27@googlegroups.com>
 <mjnpkt$b6j$1@dont-email.me>
 <59a4ee45-23fb-4b0e-905c-cc16ce46b5f6@googlegroups.com>
 <mjo0mk$7qu$1@dont-email.me>
 <46b2dce1-2a1c-455d-b041-3a9d217e2c3f@googlegroups.com>
 <mjpsdi$6cq$1@dont-email.me>
 <ac78c8c6-de94-4f92-afcb-c1ae78523245@googlegroups.com>
 <mk85s3$uee$1@loke.gir.dk> <87a8wnu3v0.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <mk9ggb$8d0$1@dont-email.me>
 <alpine.CYG.2.11.1505290801190.6584@WIL414CHAPIN.vtc.vsc.edu>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1d01bb71-970f-44e0-9d38-d45520d2722e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Build language with weak typing, then add scaffolding later to
 strengthen it?
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:00:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:193386
Date: 2015-05-29T14:00:07-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 6:03:12 AM UTC-6, Peter Chapin wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2015, Bj=F6rn Lundin wrote:
>=20
> > If you ask around enough, you will likely get answers that wants to kee=
p=20
> > 'odd' features. I - for example - love the separate construct. we use i=
t=20
> > a lot. But I think not too many use it.
>=20
> I also like using subunits now and then. It seems like a good fit when I=
=20
> have a package with one unusually large subprogram that dominates the=20
> package's physical content, but is just not important enough, or logicall=
y=20
> distinct enough, to make into its own unit.
>=20
> Peter

I find that happens in parsing; especially unserialization.