From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6d862eabdeb1fc4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!87.79.20.105.MISMATCH!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <7GwJn.4712$z%6.3258@edtnps83> <4xAKn.4703$Z6.1197@edtnps82> <82d3wj6sbz.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: <1cl35w1r5c3y0$.vqtml20f61su$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2010 10:33:44 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: e8bd1a18.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=PHM0BG=MIS=_A0jCfgHO6>McF=Q^Z^V384Fo<]lROoR18kF7enW;^6ZC`4\`mfM[68DC37 On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:06:06 -0700 (PDT), AdaMagica wrote: > On 26 Mai, 09:59, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) > wrote: >> Le Wed, 26 May 2010 09:21:52 +0200, Stephen Leake � >> a �crit:> "Ada" refers to a standard language definition. It is written in >>> English (there may be translations to other languages available). >> >> Really ? >> I've never seen it in an other language than English (my self, in the � >> past, I though about doing a french translation, bug gave up : too much � >> work and time required for strictly no return expected). > > For Ada 83, there's a translation into German (I've got it at home) by > Siemens, which is quite good. I have a Russian translation of the Ada 83 standard, published under one cover with Gehani. Both were excellent. > For Ada 95, there's a translation into russian http://www.ada-ru.org/, > but I can't judge the quality. This is not a translation of the standard, it is an original work on the principles and techniques of programming in Ada. It is good, IMO, deserves publishing in English and other languages. AFAIK all Rationales are translated into Russian. I cannot tell if the actual standard is. (I am not a big fan of translated standards.) -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de