From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab1d177a5a26577d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Edward Fish <edward.r.fish@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++?
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1c9e385a-b3f8-4221-9082-029e389c6ba4@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <1ee1a434-4048-48f6-9f5e-d8126bebb808@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <4D5C1824.3020509@obry.net>
 <21443638-5ec6-49d4-aafe-6fbc1e59daba@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <b9455b1f-1db2-4e10-bdb7-13b0e305d7a6@h40g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <87d2371e-af91-4d6a-8d5b-3ddb972d84fd@k17g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vq18691rule2fv@douda-yannick> <87zkpuze5e.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <4d5d791f$0$17330$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <ijk8ua$cbe$2@news.eternal-september.org>
 <4d5da93f$0$17330$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <ijka9s$hnd$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <4d5daeea$0$17330$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.187.177
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298059088 2352 127.0.0.1 (18 Feb 2011 19:58:08
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:58:08 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.187.177;
 posting-account=IGEw6QoAAAChe8btAoGmJk0kqF3q3VLA
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17432
Date: 2011-02-18T11:58:08-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 17, 3:27=A0pm, Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> wrote:
> It seems more unusual, when you want your
> enumerators to have specific internal values, to also claim that they're
> not "really" integers.

Really?
Type Permissions is ( Read, Write );

Doesn't look like integers to me.
Even with
For Permissions use record
  Read  =3D> 2#0001#,
  Write =3D> 2#0010#
end record;

it doesn't.