From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f23f789345652e5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Users of the BON notation among Ada users ?
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1c62fb5a-a77c-4cb4-a27c-ec8ed3a1018e@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <c06663c9-c55a-4721-8800-9d01b26902d2@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<0e67d712-c126-478f-b1bc-d2d22ae66952@w1g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
	<BvKdnZmQqbXfEPbUnZ2dnUVZ8o2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <25hhkg.t4r.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.142
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231839890 27378 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2009 09:44:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:44:50 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.142;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4228
Date: 2009-01-13T01:44:49-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13 jan, 08:50, Jean-Pierre Rosen <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> In the old times, people were proud of having obscure code with a
> comment saying "this is impossible to understand, but don't worry, it
> works". Nowadays, people are proud of covering the walls of their office
> with the most complicated class diagram possible. HOOD is intended to
> limit the complexity one has to deal with. How can you prove you are the
> big guy with such a method?
Someone somewhere gonna give a forced laugh. This comment goes on the
same ways as the one which talk about agressive marketing behaviour of
some UML promoters (I do not know if it is ok to have such words here,
so I may need to apologize, but now it is said)

> Hmmm, I think I could go on like this forever ;-)
Yes.

Interesting to note that one of the most ranked web page about HOOD,
is one on AdaLog : http://www.adalog.fr/hoodsamp.htm