From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec21c3c7cdc7ff3e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Handling invalid objects
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <Ni2Uf.9848$wD1.7244@trnddc02>
 <3pKdnRGO2eWjQr3ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <1peyefbqozdml.afdrxqiuyi0b$.dlg@40tude.net> <dvr53p$4ri$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:05:48 +0100
Message-ID: <1c2j4h3onbhmk.p3uisoojg34b$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Mar 2006 12:05:48 MET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 02eb81e3.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=mK0cCVl_?X8j12nnM8XB1>:ejgIfPPld4jW\KbG]kaM8eDdmR4DE3R<cZFlJki\Na4WRXZ37ga[7:n919Q4_`Vj9NZZj5LgkU<7
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3551
Date: 2006-03-22T12:05:48+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:10 +0100, Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> 
>> Still exception contracts would greatly improve safety of Ada as a
>> language.
> 
> If by exception contracts you mean embedding the exception specification 
> in the "signature" of the procedure/function, then it was already 
> exercised by the Java community with rather disappointing effects.

If Java did it wrong, let's do it right in Ada.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de