From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joe Pfeiffer Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada,comp.programming,comp.databases.xbase.fox,comp.lang.clipper Subject: Re: Simulating the rolling of dices to produce truly random numbers? Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:43:29 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <1bk1wplfla.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net> References: <1bshbdljfk.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net> <1bo9m1lim5.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e48ed228894a3d17117219bdcb899310"; logging-data="18068"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+KdHz9Ojs2kuArSg2tQEKU0dbggfQkKEM=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WaMUxFesW1YY4Kx459Z+MvaBVXU= sha1:Q9LXZ+yno/i7hZG5CpG+7kLFrF8= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.c:204218 comp.lang.ada:49855 comp.programming:20480 comp.databases.xbase.fox:197 comp.lang.clipper:3115 Date: 2018-01-10T11:43:29-07:00 List-Id: "Mr. Man-wai Chang" writes: > On 11/1/2018 01:38, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >> >> Dice are plenty random enough -- you're talking about simulating them. >> A *simulation* of dice won't be random enough unless you put randomness >> into it. > > Could I say the same to quantum mechanics and its implementations? :) Yes.