From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:104b:: with SMTP id 72mr1192441ity.27.1555448172535;
        Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4c08:: with SMTP id z8mr19560145oia.30.1555448172336;
 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!136no18291itk.0!news-out.google.com!w17ni28itb.0!nntp.google.com!b2no19270itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1127d366-d36c-4abf-8590-4b8c0e2b5446@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2.123.143.189;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.123.143.189
References: <b411a770-5e86-4d5e-9e43-e52843be724d@googlegroups.com>
 <bc07b54c-0e86-4a40-931c-ca52d0295564@googlegroups.com>
 <q93bqr$qj3$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1127d366-d36c-4abf-8590-4b8c0e2b5446@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1beabd13-0c34-4d8a-9a57-45243a07ffc4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Why can't objects be static in Ada?
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:56:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2061
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2460828605
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56141
Date: 2019-04-16T13:56:12-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 13:11:36 UTC+1, Mark Lorenzen  wrote:

> How can it be ensured that a library written in Ada does not require any =
elaboration. Pragma Pure? I think that such libraries are "nice" but pragma=
 Pure is too restrictive for that purpose. In such cases it would be good, =
if e.g. the OP's problem could be solved at compile time without any elabor=
ation.

I don't think it can, going by this thread. I also think this is why Ada wi=
ll fail in other environments, i.e. not security or safety critical stuff, =
but where performance is important.