From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,587e0e0a16d65b10
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f11g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Invade wikipedia!
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <1bae178f-8c50-4298-8250-79d41e9c0a9d@f11g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
References: <l6k0og.o0o.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <49a415c4$0$32675$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
	<08cbf95f-1a72-4a93-8c21-55b1411b6608@j12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
	<49a47c51$0$30227$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <f0d14faf-29a9-484b-8705-591f6a439340@i38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<49a5e7d4$0$31337$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.154
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1235619187 9783 127.0.0.1 (26 Feb 2009 03:33:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:33:07 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f11g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.154;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4781
Date: 2009-02-25T19:33:06-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 26 f=E9v, 01:52, Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-
bug.bauh...@maps.futureapps.de> wrote:
> Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne) wrote:
> >>> If this kind of pseudo code was suffiscient to really and precisely
> >>> express algorithms, it would be a real language.
> >> Pseudo code of the kind in question is a real language.
> >> By analogy, no one writes Turing machine programs in
> >> commercial applications[***]. Still, his fictional(!)
> >> machine is entirely programmed using "pseudo code"[****].
> >> A Turing machine is defined precisely and
> >> its languages are real programming languages.
> > When I read you, I'm thinking about something like LISP. Is that Ok if
> > got this image in mind ?
>
> The gist of it is that there is a sufficiently small
> and simple language and machine model to work with.

I like this abstract very much. Thanks for this sentence.