From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,e793d50ead4087cc X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Received: by 10.180.79.228 with SMTP id m4mr8394861wix.7.1356837414632; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:16:54 -0800 (PST) Path: i11ni337233wiw.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Thickening Ada GTK or Vala Binding ? Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:07:21 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1b6lxwgy1k8dv.80a4pq6ce32b$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <0c94b952-2bdf-4f25-98a3-91a67ed2355d@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: 6/SyjDFvQ5V7ZR2+GYgbDQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-12-27T20:07:21+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:45:40 -0800 (PST), Patrick wrote: > My plan was to write more C functions to hide away as much GTK complexity > as possible and to bind to these functions. Won't work. C API of Gtk are more complex than GtkAda API. > So for instance GTK uses glib > types a lot but I don�t want to have strange looking gint types etc in > Ada, not to mention access types. Glib is essential to Gtk. You cannot write anything more or less elaborated without using GObject, GValue, GList etc. GInt is the type used by Gtk for signed integers. Access types are used because Gtk does. Remember Gtk is in C. C does not have arrays and cannot return anything on the stack except from scalar types. GtkAda just follows C, simplifying it where possible. E.g. Get_Text returns String rather than the mess the native C API does (e.g. gtk_entry_get_text). As I said, GtkAda is simpler than C API. > There is tons of C Gtk documentation, examples and a large community to > call for help with on. You have to learn Gtk in order to be able to use it. Once you did, the problems you have now would simply disappear (and others, real problems would appear in their place) > I don�t see how anyone could use it unless they had a very strong > understanding of both Ada and C GTK. Learning Gtk is an absolute requirement. > If I was going to write c functions to hide away the GTK ugliness why > don�t just write them in Ada and help the community. 1. Nobody needs that. For people who know Gtk these would be useless. 2. It would be impossible to design because if you know Gtk you cannot understand the logic and difficulties of somebody who does not know it. If you start writing the stuff, you will drop it once you gain enough knowledge of Gtk, to see all pointlessness of the task. > Does anyone have some small code examples that might help with this? Small Gtk code examples can be found in rosetta code. But, honestly, there is only one example needed: a window with one button. The rest is concrete Gtk widgets and objects which are learnt by doing. > Or tips on how I could make another wrapper around Ada GTK ? By calling Ada subprogram from another Ada subprogram, I suppose. Why anybody would need Ada wrappers around Ada? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de