From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be4b51b40516c4c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-25 03:33:48 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: prichtmyer@yahoo.com (Peter Richtmyer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Allocating Memory with "new" Date: 25 Apr 2003 03:33:48 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <1b585154.0304250233.28bb24d@posting.google.com> References: <1b585154.0304241130.35fa0a97@posting.google.com> <3ea8d041$0$4083$4d4ebb8e@read.news.de.uu.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.1.176.75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1051266828 9240 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2003 10:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2003 10:33:48 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36528 Date: 2003-04-25T10:33:48+00:00 List-Id: "Vincent Smeets" wrote in message news:<3ea8d041$0$4083$4d4ebb8e@read.news.de.uu.net>... > Every time an access type comes out of scope, the memory allocated by that > access type can be freed (garbage collection). Thanks - that certainly explains it. I thought the programmer had complete control of the memory allocated and that it would not be freed until an Unchecked Deallocate (or the program ended). Peter