From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e4f686c6837b7445 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-06 09:52:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: prichtmyer@yahoo.com (Peter Richtmyer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A little gem for your amusement. (OT) Date: 6 Jan 2003 09:52:02 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <1b585154.0301060952.23b427b5@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 164.223.72.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1041875522 27737 127.0.0.1 (6 Jan 2003 17:52:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Jan 2003 17:52:02 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32629 Date: 2003-01-06T17:52:02+00:00 List-Id: Stapler wrote in message news:... > > You know, it really does perform well. I wrote a couple test "scripts" > just to see. But goddamn it's ugly. > I don't know how it performs. As soon as I saw that: 3 * 2 + 1 evaluates to 9, I quit reading. that IS ugly. Maybe I'm just old fashioned (don't like rap either). :-) Peter