From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8429314ce5e9d92a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-19 19:43:58 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: yxc1856@njit.edu (Yaofei Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Programming Language Survey
Date: 19 May 2003 19:43:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <1b2f70c3.0305191843.4b86e1cc@posting.google.com>
References: <1b2f70c3.0305161120.6ca17b7e@posting.google.com>
 <qKWlbpQmoH9g@eisner.encompasserve.org> <baasfh$blf$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <2tNCm7hWr4Xn@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <slrnbciak8.7sv.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <oaGcnSkEFJ0-qVSjXTWcqw@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.39.42.72
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1053398637 11896 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2003 02:43:57
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2003 02:43:57 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37543
Date: 2003-05-20T02:43:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

We do use cookie, just don't want one guy to fill the survey multiple
times. That is our only purpose.

Thanks again for your participation! :-)



Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com> wrote in message news:<oaGcnSkEFJ0-qVSjXTWcqw@gbronline.com>...
> Many browsers support one or more of the following settings:
> 
>   - Ask before accepting a cookie.
> 
>   - Remember whether you said "yes" or "no" and
>     automatically apply the same answer next time
>     to a request by the same hostname.
> 
>   - Delete all cookies when you exit the browser.
> 
> Sending cookies to /dev/null means in those few cases
> where you will tolerate the cookie long enough to
> work the site, you have to fiddle with softlinks or whatever.
> 
> But if you have NO such cases, then why not have your browser
> "Just say no" ?  Most can do that, too.