From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.69.6 with SMTP id x6mr15835132qai.0.1375541443824; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.5.162 with SMTP id t2mr367646qet.24.1375541443799; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!fx3no636908qab.0!news-out.google.com!a13ni157qay.0!nntp.google.com!fx3no636902qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FCD460.1060709@obry.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.65.97.192; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.65.97.192 References: <874bf843-8212-44a4-b0c6-e20d831325bc@googlegroups.com> <51F92827.5000903@obry.net> <51f95d3a$0$14311$afc38c87@news7.united-newsserver.de> <51F97BA8.9040401@obry.net> <51f9e7e6$0$5337$afc38c87@news6.united-newsserver.de> <3ab6d365-9832-4d51-80a9-b6438930ce84@googlegroups.com> <51fbeb3e$0$81782$afc38c87@news6.united-newsserver.de> <2223020c-08d4-4533-9de5-ddd2964d373a@googlegroups.com> <51FCD460.1060709@obry.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1b27450f-e02d-4167-847b-aa6b7c3eb391@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Web Development Using Ada? From: Maciej Sobczak Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 14:50:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Bytes: 2371 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182833 Date: 2013-08-03T07:50:43-07:00 List-Id: > Note that AWS can also dispatch based on virtual host name. No need for > an external server for that. Not really. AWS uses the URL redirection to do this, which means that the user will see= , in the address field of the web browser, that there are some tricks in th= ere. This can influence the "user experience" or even have some serious imp= act on the SSL deployment strategy (certificates!). What nginx can do is a lot better. Just for an example: go to http://www.in= spirel.com and you will be served by the AWS server that is not even runnin= g on the standard 80 port. But you will not see it and this is exactly the = kind of user experience that is expected. AWS alone does not support this l= evel of transparency and flexibility. --=20 Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com