From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.31.33 with SMTP id l21mr68596984yha.20.1416239568446; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:52:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.93.72 with SMTP id cs8mr286040igb.4.1416239568200; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:52:48 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!w8no502228qac.0!news-out.google.com!c9ni14081igv.0!nntp.google.com!h15no2026301igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:52:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=KSa2aQoAAACOxnC0usBJYX8NE3x3a1Xq NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 References: <520f8f3d-b345-4ef8-ac41-ead78edde92a@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1b09d33b-78ef-459a-ba9d-afa62b38d7e9@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Can .ads be compiled alone? From: Adam Beneschan Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:52:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 1828 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3463644378 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23474 Date: 2014-11-17T07:52:47-08:00 List-Id: On Saturday, November 15, 2014 11:18:52 AM UTC-8, Robert A Duff wrote: > > > Not that in GNAT, there are no requirements on compilation order. > ^^^ > "Note that..." > > I hate that typo, because it almost negates the meaning. > And it's far from the first time I've done it. :-( The one that bugs me the most is substituting "now" for "not", which also negates the meaning. I've seen this mistake many times (and I'm sure I've done it many times), but I'm not sure why it happens so much, since "w" and "t" aren't next to each other. -- Adam