From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b41412c7bc28c47
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!storethat.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <2e9ebb23-a68b-43cf-8871-febcb173f951@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 	<4899d2af$0$19731$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
 <sbidndoc_aQH0wfVnZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@comcast.com>
 	<Pine.WNT.4.64.0808071536330.4692@teor1> <uwsispxj0.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
 	<efded36d-c0f1-45f9-b1ac-f3575f642ad7@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
 	<9LmdncTBAPGV5jbVnZ2dnUVZ_sTinZ2d@comcast.com>
 <u8wur6gok.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 	<37793f2b-2cc6-4aba-856e-cbfe503872a5@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
 	<1xqborx4epefc.11z7g8cmj4nlp.dlg@40tude.net>
 <2259e1a3-e04c-4662-affb-dae07baa4a43@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <48acc905$0$24589$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:49:56 +0200
Message-ID: <1anip96i1trze.1rdbimxeyypja$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2008 11:49:59 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: c958851b.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=m9R]liC@5=i:i=48;n?Z:`ic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa4nDHegD_]Re;fhHf=alX7gDNcfSJ;bb[eIRnRBaCd<Mn5;m3he=ol;e^<F8gX4V8Mf
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7444
Date: 2008-08-21T11:49:59+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:46:48 -0400, Peter C. Chapin wrote:

> I'm not sure allowing such a thing, even if were possible, would be a
> good idea. Types and instances are conceptually quite different and
> allowing them to reuse the same name (in the same scope) sounds
> confusing.

Hmm, exactly because they are so different, it is safe to share names
between them. (I am not arguing in favor of such a step, though)

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de