From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e490a18b9688bd9
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.62.35 with SMTP id v3mr1997830pbr.32.1316201569093;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 m9ni7697pbd.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Stream_Element_Array
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:32:45 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1ag8afgfoatci$.213fr4mlgqhr$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: 
 <edfcce02-7d80-4186-a281-c8a4983a3efd@p25g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <1e6rw4vto3ldb.i8d7fxixapx4.dlg@40tude.net> <m239fz4cpy.fsf@pushface.org>
 <b7yqos9wk4fn.15kuyzgqrkhge.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ae7ed905-c866-45a8-acbd-0e0eebc29f83@x29g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <28u4e86fk8gn$.ialexttobgr0$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <276b8d0a-5b3c-4559-a275-98620657cc2f@s30g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <ju5wgjs11mug$.4ohgki30bvpf.dlg@40tude.net>
 <01c12338-e9f8-49ab-863d-c8282be3875e@g31g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <1esmml9qftomp.vihelaijmcar$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <02671fc7-5c38-42dc-8017-529f6dead8fd@j19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <m2aaa5ftvs.fsf@pushface.org>
 <631f3859-8118-4f4c-a684-152ee5f589bf@o15g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <m262ktfpp0.fsf@pushface.org>
 <a833dae4-4d84-4155-93c1-1ce17585114e@a12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <1ha21cmm4ub0x.1x5tkefenjm53$.dlg@40tude.net> <m2wrd8eqjj.fsf@pushface.org>
 <1agiqouo0byd0$.12u30ddt25czu$.dlg@40tude.net> <m2sjnwe75i.fsf@pushface.org>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: v1unXtVHH3OmHkxoJWmV2g.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17992
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-09-16T21:32:45+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:20:09 +0100, Simon Wright wrote:

> I certainly wouldn't expect any significant performance difference
> between UDP and TCP with no-delay. I suppose what's significant for you
> may not be for me. But very few system engineers IME appreciate the
> difference; and by the time you've eliminated out-of-order UDP packets
> you may have eaten the difference anyway.

Exactly, whatever overhead TCP/IP might cause, it is one to pay anyway by
adding safety to UDP (sequence numbers, acknowledging, resending lost
packets, reordering packets etc).

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de