From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a37:6ec5:: with SMTP id j188mr5032681qkc.19.1547163501935; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:38:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:5395:: with SMTP id h143mr68962oib.6.1547163501543; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:38:21 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!v55no312444qtk.0!news-out.google.com!m21ni146qta.0!nntp.google.com!v55no312437qtk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:38:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4s8rud$9j3@tribune>#1/1> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=189.6.26.47; posting-account=eM73jQoAAADtmvwXAqgWehNcUMlnnSuL NNTP-Posting-Host: 189.6.26.47 References: <4s8rud$9j3@tribune>#1/1> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1ae2b744-f80b-4450-b8d3-7b49fca01f15@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Why couldn't an operating system be written in ada From: cenci.br@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:38:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55260 Date: 2019-01-10T15:38:21-08:00 List-Id: Em s=C3=A1bado, 13 de julho de 1996 04:00:00 UTC-3, Mark McKinney escreve= u: > It has been claimed that the capability to interface with other languages= =20 > is a great asset to ada. Sometimes interfacing can be a tremendous=20 > liability. Besides the OS could perform most of work that the language=20 > runtime does. So why not build an OS in ADA? Is this discussion still active ?