From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,172cdcb8e77bfc0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-12 21:11:42 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: semi-visibility
References: <dJbGa.123221$d51.195610@sccrnsc01>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <1acGa.173043$M01.81407@sccrnsc02>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc02 1055477501 12.234.13.56 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003 04:11:41 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 04:11:41 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 04:11:41 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39077
Date: 2003-06-13T04:11:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>Is there some reason you don't want to put type Visible_To_Relatives in the
>private part of A?
  Just that A is already bigger than I'd like.
But I've decided that once again, if Lady Ada slaps my wrist, she's right
and I didn't really want to do that anyway.  In this case that means
creating package A.BCD and renaming to A.BCD.C and A.BCD.D, possibly followed
(for less verbosity) by "package A.C renames A.BCD.C;" etc.