From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a84eaf8fb2470909 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Ada generics Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <1166710494.869393.108730@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <17fe4xfogg7p5.1dcyc5nyc2gsl.dlg@40tude.net> <1166805696.291429.239590@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> <186qujlcx6rwl.1h6eq4mbdaa5s$.dlg@40tude.net> <1167150212.165097.289010@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <1qmdvus6du3xu.1n21tzgev46ia$.dlg@40tude.net> <1167246396.057028.325080@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> <15jxp8z1iu5fk.1oeihvavjghgg$.dlg@40tude.net> <1167327306.22163.66.camel@localhost> <1on3cinnnckc5.1rxxvjhxs5qzl.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1a9k0vk46bqrq.1cx6cdld0wd9f$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Dec 2006 11:12:51 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 35724f0c.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=RIQK_USl9Ti9kIfcjg:0fdA9EHlD;3Ycb4Fo<]lROoRaFl8W>\BH3YbJiI2`nemMRfDNcfSJ;bb[eIRnRBaCd On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:25:28 -0600, Randy Brukardt wrote: > For what it's worth, Ada says that all three of these represent the same > identifier. That's not ideal, but it's the best that we can do without > dropping into the character handling mess ourselves. > > This is even more interesting when you consider that there are alternative > spellings for reserved words. For instance "acceß" is identical to "access". > (See 2.3(5.c/2) in the AARM for more examples). We wrestled with that quite > a while before deciding that such identifiers had to be illegal > (2.3(5.3/2)); we didn't want them appearing in programs in place of reserved > words. Yuck. Would "acceβ" with Greek beta (β) and "if" with Cyrillic і in it be valid identifiers? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de