From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,44b0b57dd5d8f69
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.90.102 with SMTP id bv6mr867807pab.34.1344223403356;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 20:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 c10ni88296pbw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Patrick <patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: List of Negative Language rules?
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1a891f78-a75c-4597-9793-1296e693e07d@googlegroups.com>
References: <e6963165-d99c-4b35-be88-b9f7aa8d5f4a@googlegroups.com>
 <p6ft18dvj55o0h1j3af7ic08f2omoc1j20@invalid.netcom.com>
 <a87vkfFb7rU1@mid.individual.net>
 <5b1caa0f-464a-4ff9-881e-202e4766f0df@googlegroups.com>
 <op.wilemnk8ka8ora@aspire.local>
 <1949c50a-553a-4d40-92f0-9a5c0663cd55@googlegroups.com>
 <jvnbro$qka$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.53.16.194
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344223403 1453 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2012 03:23:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 03:23:23 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <jvnbro$qka$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.53.16.194;
 posting-account=cUi90woAAADTaOISowbbHM8GUD0-opJO
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-08-05T20:21:35-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thanks Randy

Yes, "shall not" added another 1000 lines to my file(it's 4K lines). Right =
now I am rereading Barnes and high-lighting what appear to be legality rule=
s(Thanks for the term). Once I am done, I'll see if it's sensible to look t=
hrough my grep created document, it worries me that you don't think it will=
 be fruitful. I do trust your intelligence