From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 02:43:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language? Message-ID: <1Q9Fg223+mec@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <5be89e2f.0107170838.c71ad61@posting.google.com> <9j1uio$8br$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <5be89e2f.0107171810.1cee29c0@posting.google.com> Organization: LJK Software Date: 18 Jul 2001 05:43:30 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.44.122.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 995449412 216.44.122.34 (Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:43:32 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:43:32 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10138 Date: 2001-07-18T05:43:30-05:00 List-Id: In article <5be89e2f.0107171810.1cee29c0@posting.google.com>, codesavvy@aol.com (codesavvy) writes: > I don't care if you think I'm trolling, I'm not. I think the answer But we care, because it cruds up the newsgroup with repetition. If you have a specific question, feel free to ask it, but first you should read http://www.adapower.com/ > is rather obvious, Ada has nothing to offer that is substantially > better than what C++ offers. I've read posts in this news group that > extoll Ada for it's many virtues but the truth of the matter is that > they are overrated if they exist at all. Are there any statistics > that state that Ada leads to more reliable, maintainable, or robust > code than does C++? What class(es) of programming problems does Ada > solve that C++ can't?