From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a585ebe495b2eeaf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-24 09:34:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Biggar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Idea: create comp.lang.ada.spark - thoughts? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1NeY9.24630$AV4.2012@sccrnsc01> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.235.88.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1043429565 12.235.88.213 (Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:32:45 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:32:45 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:34:23 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33408 Date: 2003-01-24T17:34:23+00:00 List-Id: Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > * Rod Chapman wrote: > >>So...what do you think? Good idea? Bad idea? Don't care? > > > Bad idea. Spark traffic does not harm in cla itself. Besides the standard rule of thumb here is that if the parent group isn't actively trying to kick you out, you probably don't have enought traffic to justify a new sub-group. -- Mark Biggar mark.a.biggar@attbi.com