From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1d728aa632a5b94 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr17952957pbc.0.1341730424357; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni11132pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ? Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 08:53:30 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <19yhfqeqkm9kc$.fcax7yetctwy$.dlg@40tude.net> References: Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-07-08T08:53:30+02:00 List-Id: On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:02:36 -0700 (PDT), rodakay@internode.on.net wrote: > Has anyone had any success with interface types ? Yes, of course. We are heavily using them in our projects. > I recently added a function to an interface type. Now when I invoke a > function of the interface type, a different function is called. You should post a small example illustrating the case. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de