From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,64b29dfa2220a59f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!storethat.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <1185134043.892012.217560@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <1185203238.701948.307410@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <f83ish$p8o$1@jacob-sparre.dk> <wccr6mx5pz0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <f864k3$gmv$1@jacob-sparre.dk> <wcctzrtrzhz.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <f886vf$gie$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1185395844.104043.194340@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <46a7c85b$0$3827$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1185431043.649372.223760@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
 <10fo5wx5wokvq$.1e0lhbpujtpma$.dlg@40tude.net> <46A85961.4020603@obry.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:59:36 +0200
Message-ID: <19s63vrdkueok.1mmtmub9max5j$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Jul 2007 11:55:49 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5e5a170a.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=g]\FZCMBl0I[kmHKHnaEnMA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRAgUcjd<3m<;BHo4K@emjnI@[6LHn;2LCVN7enW;^6ZC`DIXm65S@:3>OGDWBGCB]ZnN
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1199
Date: 2007-07-26T11:55:49+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:20:49 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:

> And mind Randy I do not expect to have to use such artifices in my code.
> I do expect a compiler to deliver the "expected" best implementation for
> every supported features. I'm not in the embedded domain and frankly all
> those low-level details are distractions, I prefer to concentrate on my
> application and not fighting the compiler :)

Wholeheartedly agree
 
> The main point for Ada to me is the high level abstraction.

Yes 

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de