From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: GNAT listing file default names (was: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses) Date: 1999/09/29 Message-ID: <1999Sep29.074624.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530677068 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky> <7smp30$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7sp8m9$a6e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Sep28.074901.1@eisner> <7srmd7$2dr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 938605588 28323 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7srmd7$2dr$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar writes: > Listing file? what's that? Seriously, like most modern compilers > GNAT does not provide an old style listing file. You can if you > like ask for complete listing output, but this is generated to > standard output, and is redirected as required (unlike the > situation in VMS, redirection of this kind is very simple in > Unix and DOS-like systems). To me /LISTING=[MYDIR.LISTINGS] doesn't seem complex, but we digress. Are you saying that if I issue whatever is the GNAT command for: "Recompile it all for production and give me a full listing for the permanent record of exactly what machine instructions shipped to customers for each source line." the listing from all compilation units ends up in a single file ? Yes, I realize that for optimizing compilers the bit about "for each source line" is incredibly difficult for a human to trace, and one hopes to never need it, but it does happen. Larry Kilgallen