From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses. Date: 1999/09/28 Message-ID: <1999Sep28.134854.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530384679 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky> <37EF9B98.7F817CC0@pwfl.com> <7sqb4r$15d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7sqmk6$1ck3@drn.newsguy.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 938540937 4745 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7sqmk6$1ck3@drn.newsguy.com>, bill@yy writes: > How often do you see a programmer make a printout of their code, and > go ask another programmer to code review the code with them? How often > do you a programmer print their own code and look at it? I mean really > look at it? Whether printed paper is the medium is an issue of local fashion, but many serious projects require another individual to sign off before code is checked in. Really serious projects do formal inspection with a team rather than a single individual reviewing the code. Larry Kilgallen