From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e94a7e4f6f888766 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Self-referential types Date: 1999/10/21 Message-ID: <1999Oct21.075422.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 538816079 References: <7ttb4a$8mq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3802f2db_2@news1.prserv.net> <3803B5E3.F96A6DD4@mitre.org> <3803c8bc_2@news1.prserv.net> <3804E7E0.6A0265FB@mitre.org> <38077EB3.E6911567@mitre.org> <380CA5AC.82499FE2@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <7um9ji$dor$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 940506866 26984 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7um9ji$dor$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar writes: > In article <380CA5AC.82499FE2@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>, > Wes Groleau wrote: >> If good naming conventions are used, it can _greatly_ reduce >> the need for comments. > > My own view is that good names are an *adjunct* to good > comments, not a substitute for them. Well try this wording: If bad naming conventions are used, it can _greatly_ increase the need for comments. Example: declare -- -- Despite what you might infer from our efforts -- to cloak the symbol table, the following -- contains the number of miles to the next city. -- Weight_In_Kilograms : NATURAL := 0; :-) Larry Kilgallen