From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,50ad4ada98045ba X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: A small Ada success story Date: 1999/03/19 Message-ID: <1999Mar19.133645.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 456586243 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <119fb4e248%hubersn@lcs.wn.bawue.de> <36efef1c.3265725@news.pacbell.net> <7cp9cp$743$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36F0A77F.B0151962@rocketmail.com> <7crpn2$kt6@drn.newsguy.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 921868609 4056 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7crpn2$kt6@drn.newsguy.com>, bill writes: > Java does all that out of the box. I found Ada exception tracing to be weak > compared to Java more powerfull exceptions. In Java, an exception is an object, > that contains very usefull info that one can use. Information regarding Ada95 exceptions can be retrieved; I am not convinced that saying they "contain" the data or that they are "objects" would enhance anything. Larry Kilgallen