From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fede738cdda9b386
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Ada OO Terminology
Date: 1999/07/29
Message-ID: <1999Jul29.161103.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 506715788
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <37A0A0F9.55CC@radium.ncsc.mil>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 933279069 1065 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37A0A0F9.55CC@radium.ncsc.mil>, Tim Kremann <tkremann@radium.ncsc.mil> writes:
> Reading modern OO books and trying to relate "accepted OO terminology"
> to Ada concepts and constructs is difficult. Is there an online
> reference that would relate OO terminolgy to Ada language
> implementations?

I would suggest reading some of the many Ada books listed at sites such
as www.adahome.com, www.adaic.org or www.adapower.com.

> I have questions like:
> 
> 	1. Typing, is it dynamically checked or just statically?

Since 1983 it has done both.  Which, when, why takes some study,
as do several of your questions.

iIf you are familiar with C, there is one paper listed at those
sites describing Ada for reformed C programmers.  It may even be
a book by now.

Larry Kilgallen