From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java
Date: 1999/02/09
Message-ID: <1999Feb9.075618.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 442408324
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net>
 <tz5n2.4608$TO5.129375@ptah.visi.com> <369DDDC3.FDE09999@sea.ericsson.se>
 <369e309a.32671759@news.demon.co.uk> <77ledn$eu7$1@remarQ.com>
 <77pnqc$cgi$1@newnews.global.net.uk> <m3ww2mgzmj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <8p64spq5lo5.fsf@Eng.Sun.COM> <77t3ld$nou$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <79ce4s$lfq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <79chc7$ko6@drn.newsguy.com>
 <79dodb$rhf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <umqbtj9m636.fsf@maestro.clustra.com>
 <79jeos$bu4@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net> <79k65l$s0t@drn.news
 <36c006b8.fc6c187d@acenet.com.au>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 918564982 2285 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2]
Organization: Digital Equipment Computer User's Society
Followup-To: <36c006b8.fc6c187d@acenet.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1999-02-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Organization: LJK Software
Lines: 10

In article <36C006B8.FC6C187D@acenet.com.au>, Geoff Bull <gbull@acenet.com.au> writes:

> Do the C++ compiler vendors certify that their libraries 
> work with threading?

If the compiler vendors do not supply access to the threading package,
it would seem there is no way they could no what threading package was
to be used, and thus what they have to safeguard.

Larry Kilgallen