From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,effb80d4bb7716dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Wanted: Ada STL. Reward: Ada's Future Date: 1999/02/04 Message-ID: <1999Feb4.141530.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 440697356 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <790f4q$3l@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net> <36B856E4.D921C1D@bton.ac.uk> <79cc3q$mms$1@remarQ.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 918155733 24929 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <79cc3q$mms$1@remarQ.com>, "Pat Rogers" writes: > Why not have the Ada community "standardize" on the the free Ada 95 > Booch Components? Specifically, expanding them after the core from > the C++ version is completed? Because the variety of meanings of the word "free" covers some things that cannot be included in commercial software. At some point it is easier to reinvent the wheel than to spend life pretending to be a lawyer. Larry Kilgallen