From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,325a055bed62c230
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris
Date: 1999/12/08
Message-ID: <1999Dec8.072914.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 558114313
References: <82hiuj$74o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82hnll$ahu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <82hokf$b9l$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <82ktik$j4c$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <82lcr0$tsg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 944656159 18223 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <82lcr0$tsg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, reason67@my-deja.com writes:

> BTW: Both compilers were set at no optimization.

So two compilers were told to build inefficient programs.

Clearly the one that created the slower program is the better compiler :-)