From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,94270c9178ad7e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: New Home for Ada-Malaysia Date: 1999/12/03 Message-ID: <1999Dec3.104237.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 556242268 References: <824s0t$h2r$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8260kf$aan$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <828522$bho$1@clnews.edf.fr> X-Trace: news.decus.org 944235761 10041 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <828522$bho$1@clnews.edf.fr>, "Pascal Obry" writes: > > Ted Dennison a �crit dans le message : > 8260kf$aan$1@nnrp1.deja.com... >> There's an Ada/Linux success story on that site that's worth a read ( >> http://greenlime.com/Ada-Malaysia/success_story_1.html ). The project >> was the complete reimplementation of a system, and the realtive >> statistics for the two systems are quite striking. >> >> Of course one could argue that a complete redesign in *any* langauge >> might have achived similar benifits. > > I would not have assumed that for the "Down Time". One could expect to > see more problems during the first months for the new version. That's a > real nice feedback ! That success story looked _so_ good (in general) as to be questionable. Has anyone obtained independent corroboration, other than reading this web site ? Larry Kilgallen