From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32f54b2230c68d7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Compilers for VAX Was: Ada version of C's 'static'
Date: 1999/08/06
Message-ID: <1999Aug6.130439.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 509653086
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <7n03us$862$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3798EDE9.90B9623B@averstar.com>
 <wccr9lhnh8b.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 933959086 11341 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <wccr9lhnh8b.fsf@world.std.com>, Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com> writes:
> kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
> 
>> If there is no requirement that the compiler be validated for the
>> platform, Averstar's Ada-to-C AdaMagic compiler might work.
> 
> AverStar's Ada-to-C compiler is validated.

I was under the impression that validation was always for a specific
development machine and target machine.

Was I incorrect in that impression, or are you saying the machine on
which it was validated was VAX/VMS ?

Larry Kilgallen