From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e3f2390630f30a3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: URGENT: year 2000 compliance
Date: 1999/08/24
Message-ID: <1999Aug24.083926.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 516562636
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <935487077.548895@dedale.pandemonium.fr>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 935498370 26187 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <935487077.548895@dedale.pandemonium.fr>, "=:-) Vincent" <vincent.brosseau@bruker.fr> writes:
> Does anybody know if GNAT 3.10p is Y2K compliant ?

If you are looking for a vendor to warrant Y2K behavior,
then you need something other than the "p" (public, free,
unsupported) version.

If you just care about "easily discovered bugs" then
the test program offered may be adequate.

Larry Kilgallen