From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6413b417b806eb28 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Linux Kernel in Ada. Repost Date: 1999/04/09 Message-ID: <1999Apr9.143759.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 464529294 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <7eg43i$d3b$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <370CC730.4C6112DB@utech.net> <370D7007.2D3AD58B@rocketmail.com> <7el9so$geb@drn.newsguy.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 923683083 12217 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7el9so$geb@drn.newsguy.com>, me@me writes: > > Why don't we write a brand new OS in Ada? It will be all in 100% pure > Ada. It will be the most powerfull, most reliable, most flexible, > 100% up-time, 24 hrs per day, 365 days per year, and runs on 1000 CPU's > without a sweat, a kicks Ass OS, it will mnake Solaris and Linux and > the Hurd and VMS and OS390 look like little babies in front of it. Why some of us don't is that applications drive the operating system, and the last successful commercial operating system that was actually brand new was probably 16 years ago. Windows 2000 brings along the baggage of DOS, which brought along the baggage of CP/M. VMS brought the baggage of RSX. AS/400 brought the baggage of System 36 and System 38. Additionally, it seems doubtful the assembled multitude could agree on a feature set. File versions, security constraints, file naming, hardware platform, etc. are all sufficient to bring to the discussion more heat than light. > Why don't we write a brand new OS in Ada? It will be all in 100% pure > Ada. It will be the most powerfull, most reliable, most flexible, > 100% up-time, 24 hrs per day, 365 days per year, and runs on 1000 CPU's > without a sweat, a kicks Ass OS, it will mnake Solaris and Linux and > the Hurd and VMS and OS390 look like little babies in front of it. Choice of implementation language does not give all those qualities to an operating system. It may make achieving them easier, but it does not even guarantee that they are possible. Larry Kilgallen