From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7532bb41d4ac458d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: MaryAnn Atkinson <maryann_30@yahoo.com>
Subject: Questions about Unchecked_Conversion
Date: 1999/12/15
Message-ID: <19991215201559.23735.qmail@web218.mail.yahoo.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 561098956
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
X-Trace: menuisier.enst.fr 945288971 10025 137.194.161.2 (15 Dec 1999 20:16:11
 GMT)
Organization: ENST, France
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Dec 1999 20:16:11 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-15T20:16:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

1. Could someone please explain a few things about Unchecked Conversion
   and what it really does for me? What if I dont have it there?

2. What is the difference (as far as unchecked_conversion is concerned)

   between the following?

   a. FUNCTION ABC(A, B);
   b. FUNCTION KLM IS NEW Unchecked_Conversion(A, B);

   Could the KLM function be defined the same as the ABC function
above, 
   but in the body of the KLM function be placed a WITH
Unchecked_Conversion;
   statement? Would this have the same effect?

3. What happens if we place the statement With Unchecked_Conversion; 
   somewhere in the top of our program? Does this mean that from then
   on, and for the whole pgm, no conversion exception is raised 
   anywhere?

MAA


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com