From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e80a1497a689d8a5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: David Botton <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: Ammo-zilla
Date: 1999/10/24
Message-ID: <19991024.18033546@db3.max5.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 540015345
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <38120FAF.945ADD7D@hso.link.com>
 <slrn8156pm.pl.aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk> <7uutgd$87h$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net
X-Trace: news.gate.net 940788251 5048 199.227.148.191 (24 Oct 1999 18:04:11
 GMT)
Organization: CyberGate, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 1999 18:04:11 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-10-24T18:04:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Now that's an interesting comment, because to me C++ and Ada
> are identical in this particular department, can you explain
> why you think Ada is better wrt memory leaks?

As a result of the excellent design of Ada, I use far more static=20
allocation then dynamic resulting in less chance of memory leaks. Of=20=

course once you start playing with the heap its all about personal=20
programmer discipline.

David Botton