From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,857262ad7d0ad537
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mojaveg@ridgecrest.ca.us (Everett M. Greene)
Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use?
Date: 1999/06/26
Message-ID: <19990626.7A2D4E8.143E4@mojaveg.ridgecrest.ca.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 494345781
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <7j1qng$4fp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37576ded.26569745@news.mpx.com.au>
 <7j8ac0$eah$1@uranium.btinternet.com> <7jh07e$tek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jhp34$6f1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jjij7$qci$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jl9n3$n9j$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
 <19990610.7A689D8.FF4B@mojaveg.ridgecrest.ca.us>
 <7ju2k6$d2r$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <19990614.79AB570.86B3@mojaveg.ridgecrest.ca.us>
 <7l0305$55h$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: none that you'd notice
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7l0305$55h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> In article <19990614.79AB570.86B3@mojaveg.ridgecrest.ca.us>,
>   mojaveg@ridgecrest.ca.us (Everett M. Greene) wrote:
> > > > And this is after it took 10+ years to get to the `83
> > > > product?
> > > Wrong.
> >
> > What became known as Ada was in process prior to 1975.
> > 10 is a quite good approximation to the number of years
> > from inception to the first standard (if not first product).
> > The first estimates were that the initial compiler(s)
> > would be available by the end of 1975.
> 
> I know of no such estimates. There might have been estimates
> of this kind very early in the process, but the language
> design was not even vaguely complete by that time.
> 
> Again, the interesting thing here is your assumption that ten
> years is a long time for language standardization. This just
> isn't true. Look at other languages, and you will see that
> the Ada process was actually amazingly fast.

Ten years is not at all uncommon for ANSI standards which by
ANSI requirement are consensus standards of existing practice.
It sometimes takes many years to obtain agreement among
competing practictioners.  In the case of Ada, DoD made a
flat statement that their definition was the standard.
Consensus existed by decree.