From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7925ab534db73b8a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: What's the state of current Win32 PC Ada compilers?
Date: 1998/09/26
Message-ID: <1998Sep26.072738.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 395047043
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <uLQO1.5$Ec.321724@newsfeed.avtel.net>
 <360c75d9.0@news.pacifier.com>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 906809262 12402 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <360c75d9.0@news.pacifier.com>, "Steve Doiel" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com> writes:

>   Comparing a compute intensive application between GNAT 3.10p and ObjectAda
> 7.1.1, the GNAT version runs about 2x faster.  I haven't done any
> comparisons with ObjectAda 7.1.2 and I know that they have done some
> optimizations.

One area where Aonix claims they have significantly improved their
performance for ObjectAda 7.1.2 is Text_IO.  Personally I have not
done enough Text_IO with ObjectAda to notice a problem but others
have complained, and Aonix seems to be considerably affected by the
feedback on their mailing list (open to all, regardless of their
degree of customer-ness).

Larry Kilgallen