From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,71b0f5589fb2be6c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson)
Subject: Support of Task Interrupt Entries
Date: 1998/10/07
Message-ID: <1998Oct7.183511.17020@nosc.mil>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 398743369
Sender: news@nosc.mil
Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

     According to LRM 1.1.2(6), Annex J is part of the core language 
and must therefore be supported by any standard-conforming compiler.  
However, in J.7.1(1) we have, "Implementations are _permitted_ to allow 
the attachment of task entries to interrupts via the address clause."  
Does this mean that they are also permitted to disallow this?

     This is an important point to my current project, a real time sys-
tem with a very large number of interrupt handlers that is porting from 
Ada 83 to Ada 95.  The validated Ada compiler that we have selected does 
not support J.7.1.

				Charlie
--
******

     For an email response, my user name is "sampson" and my host
is "spawar.nosc.mil".