From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95eaa0c908f1c040
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/27
Message-ID: <1998Nov27.163354.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 416322313
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl> <9eV62.403$Wj.3147@SnBeta>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 912202437 8024 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9eV62.403$Wj.3147@SnBeta>, "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com> writes:
> partha sarathi panda wrote in message
> <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>...
>>can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does
> even
>>compare with  the tight c++ one?
> 
> 
> Why is a person from Rational asking this question?

Presumably for the same reason anyone from any company might.

Did you think Rational was composed entirely of people devoted to Ada ?
Perhaps the purpose of the post is to disabuse you of that notion :-)

Larry Kilgallen