From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85e8c53792269cfd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Ada and UNICODE?
Date: 1998/05/20
Message-ID: <1998May20.091647.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 354952034
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <355CA32B.7B77@erols.com> <dewar.895283044@merv>
 <35606616.0@news4.his.com> <dewar.895560795@merv>
 <8790nxooru.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com> <3562A240.150F17BC@cl.cam.ac.uk>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 895670542 28865 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-05-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <3562A240.150F17BC@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Markus Kuhn <Markus.Kuhn@cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:
> Ronald Cole wrote:
> [Unicode in Japan]
>> Probably won't happen.  The Japanese don't like the "han-unification"
>> in Unicode or UTF-x.
> 
> Only those Japanese programmers who haven't really understood Unicode.

So I could say that Ada has been universally embraced by C programmers,
except for those C programmers who haven't really understood Ada ?

Larry Kilgallen