From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ee02783c13c3480 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Object Ada (Aonix) Date: 1998/02/12 Message-ID: <1998Feb12.151442.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 324534931 References: <34E32C78.41C6@snv.jussieu.fr> Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org X-Trace: news.decus.org 887314490 3807 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <34E32C78.41C6@snv.jussieu.fr>, Dominique Bouthinon writes: > Are there known bugs in Object Ada (Aonix) ? Yes, there are known bugs in all software shipping from all vendors. Each vendor must make a decision regarding the risk of destabilizing or delaying a given version of their software by introducing change. Thus it is best to fix some mix of the most grievous and the best- understood bugs for each release and gradually improve quality rather than risk sudden decreases in quality by trying to fix _all_ bugs no matter how ill-reported. If you want to know if there are bugs which will affect your own programming projects, it would be best to sign up for one or both of the ObjectAda mailing lists (Intel and Unix) as outlined on their Web site. The ObjectAda Intel customers are particularly non-shy. Larry Kilgallen