From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2702c1ed8be62863 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: RE: What ada 83 compiler is *best* Date: 1998/12/03 Message-ID: <1998Dec3.133402.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 418326435 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: X-Trace: news.decus.org 912710046 22099 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , to.reply@read.my.sig (Rick Thorne) writes: > Look, too, at the Usenet news groups. Compare the traffic on > comp.lang.ada to comp.lang.c++.* and comp.lang.java.*. The Ada newgroup > is orders of magnitude smaller. comp.lang.ada is of a size where one can keep up with all posts. But I do not understand the merit of choosing a language just because the trouble calls are more voluminous. Larry Kilgallen