From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114669,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid114669,public X-Google-Thread: 1147fc,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid1147fc,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: ADA on the super Date: 1998/04/21 Message-ID: <1998Apr21.073722.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 346277183 References: <6h7v0c$r68$1@bambi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <6ha2lu$5cb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6hfjmg$hvt@top.mitre.org> Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Distribution: inet X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org X-Trace: news.decus.org 893158654 29524 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.sys.super,comp.parallel.mpi,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Andi Kleen writes: > It is surprising that Gnat doesn't do this. At least the C frontend of gcc > does a very similar optimization: But what should the C front end of gcc have to do with the Ada front end of gcc (GNAT) ? They were written by different groups of people at different periods of time in different implementation languages. Larry Kilgallen